Difference between revisions of "KM Self-assessment"
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | {{Clustering stage}} | + | {{Clustering stage}}, |
| + | |||
| + | {{Content}}, | ||
| + | |||
| + | {{Links}} | ||
==Definition== | ==Definition== | ||
{{PAGENAME}} is {{ {{PAGENAME}} }} | {{PAGENAME}} is {{ {{PAGENAME}} }} | ||
| Line 14: | Line 18: | ||
== Description== | == Description== | ||
| + | ===Self-evaluation report=== | ||
| + | Based on an existing or evolving programme, the faculty or department has a process for preparation a self-evaluation report describing its capacity to deliver an educational programme in a particular technical field or discipline. | ||
| + | |||
| + | The structure of the self-evaluation report should include information on the following elements: | ||
| + | |||
| + | * Period covered by the evaluation; | ||
| + | * Faculty/department presentation and history; | ||
| + | * Accreditation procedure; | ||
| + | * Comparison to national (or international) standards; | ||
| + | * Type and duration of the proposed education programme; | ||
| + | * Involvement of industry in the programme development and implementation; | ||
| + | * Main objectives; | ||
| + | * General and specific competencies of the graduates. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Actions to attract and retain the best staff members and students: | ||
| + | * Capabilities of the academic staff (CV’s, involvement in the teaching, research and administrative activities of the evaluated department, etc.); | ||
| + | * Demography of the staff (age distribution, gender balance), existence of performance review, training and succession plan for the staff; | ||
| + | * Existing infrastructure (laboratories, soft/codes, etc.); | ||
| + | * [[Curriculum]]; | ||
| + | * Course and application description; | ||
| + | * Average time for the completion of the programme | ||
| + | * Involvement in research programmes or projects related to the chosen technical field (mainly for Masters). | ||
| + | |||
== References == | == References == | ||
==Related articles== | ==Related articles== | ||
[[category:Knowledge processes]] | [[category:Knowledge processes]] | ||
Revision as of 07:13, 12 August 2013
,
,
Contents
Definition
KM Self-assessment is The process of conducting an assessment of knowledge management maturity within the own organization and by its own staff Source: Planning and Execution of Knowledge Management Assist Missions for Nuclear Organizations
KM Self-assessment is Template:KM Self-assessment 2 Source: Safety Glossary 2007 Edition
Summary
Description
The IAEA has developed a self-assessment tool to facilitate this process.
Source: Planning and Execution of Knowledge Management Assist Missions for Nuclear Organizations
Description
Self-evaluation report
Based on an existing or evolving programme, the faculty or department has a process for preparation a self-evaluation report describing its capacity to deliver an educational programme in a particular technical field or discipline.
The structure of the self-evaluation report should include information on the following elements:
- Period covered by the evaluation;
- Faculty/department presentation and history;
- Accreditation procedure;
- Comparison to national (or international) standards;
- Type and duration of the proposed education programme;
- Involvement of industry in the programme development and implementation;
- Main objectives;
- General and specific competencies of the graduates.
Actions to attract and retain the best staff members and students:
- Capabilities of the academic staff (CV’s, involvement in the teaching, research and administrative activities of the evaluated department, etc.);
- Demography of the staff (age distribution, gender balance), existence of performance review, training and succession plan for the staff;
- Existing infrastructure (laboratories, soft/codes, etc.);
- Curriculum;
- Course and application description;
- Average time for the completion of the programme
- Involvement in research programmes or projects related to the chosen technical field (mainly for Masters).
