Difference between revisions of "Retention"
DavidBeraha (Talk | contribs) m (→Description) |
DavidBeraha (Talk | contribs) (→Description) |
||
Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
== Description== | == Description== | ||
− | Knowledge retention | + | Knowledge retention related to keeping explicit and tacit knowledge in the organization, often on long term. |
− | tacit knowledge | + | === Retaining tacit knowledge === |
− | + | The efforts to retain tacit knowledge are usually closely connected with the identification of critical knowledge and the analysis of the risk of knowledge loss. The means of retaining tacit knowledge are twofold: if possible, the knowledge may be captured (see the [[Capture]]-article for a description of methods) and the resulting documents stored in an appropriate repository, and/or [[Transfer | transferred]]. This may go hand in hand with efforts to maintain people with the requested knowledge in the organization. A good working environment as well as a reward and recognition system may persuade experts to remain in the organization. Strategies to re-engage retired experts, assigning them the task to transfer knowledge to younger staff, the may yield significant benefits. | |
+ | === Retaining explicit knowledge === | ||
The next stage of [[Preservation|KP]] is [[Storage|storing]] the [[Knowledge|knowledge]] [[Identification|identified]], [[Capture|captured]] and processed in robust and reliable | The next stage of [[Preservation|KP]] is [[Storage|storing]] the [[Knowledge|knowledge]] [[Identification|identified]], [[Capture|captured]] and processed in robust and reliable |
Revision as of 11:52, 2 January 2014
Template:Zoltan Template:DavidBeraha
,Contents
Definition
Retention is The process of keeping knowledge in an organization Source: Comparative Analysis of Methods and Tools for Nuclear Knowledge Preservation
Summary
Description
Knowledge retention related to keeping explicit and tacit knowledge in the organization, often on long term.
Retaining tacit knowledge
The efforts to retain tacit knowledge are usually closely connected with the identification of critical knowledge and the analysis of the risk of knowledge loss. The means of retaining tacit knowledge are twofold: if possible, the knowledge may be captured (see the Capture-article for a description of methods) and the resulting documents stored in an appropriate repository, and/or transferred. This may go hand in hand with efforts to maintain people with the requested knowledge in the organization. A good working environment as well as a reward and recognition system may persuade experts to remain in the organization. Strategies to re-engage retired experts, assigning them the task to transfer knowledge to younger staff, the may yield significant benefits.
Retaining explicit knowledge
The next stage of KP is storing the knowledge identified, captured and processed in robust and reliable devices to make it available for a long period of time. Storage practices by Member States, as revealed in a survey, mainly consist of archiving hardcopies and saving digital information in electronic formats.
Electronic or digital formats can be stored on hard discs, optical media (CD, DVD, etc.), streamers (magnetic tapes) and/or in a film library. These could be read-only or editable, full text or just abstracts. For information stored in databases, database design should consider ease of retrieval in the future using metadata, thesauri, taxonomies, ontology, etc. Integrated information systems provide interoperability of different knowledge formats, including text, data, drawings, videos, and/or 3-D models. The information can be classified by author, release number, date of production, subject and/or keywords. Computer aided metadata creation tools can also be used to create metadata automatically for knowledge resources. A combination of the following software/system tools can be used in the implementation of electronic or digital archives:
- Commercial relational database management systems (RDBMS), such as ORACLE, MSSQL, SYBASE, etc.;
- Intranet technology;
- Custom in-house RDBMS systems;
- Open source RDBMS, such as MySQL.
Some organizations are planning to upgrade their current storage formats, which involves enhancement of tools and technologies.
The IAEA’s INIS, undertaking preservation of nuclear knowledge for several years now, offers a very good example of data storage methods and tools, as shown in Appendix II.
Source: Comparative Analysis of Methods and Tools for Nuclear Knowledge Preservation
References
[1]