Difference between revisions of "Nuclear knowledge"

From NKM WIKIDOC
Jump to: navigation, search
m (Description)
(Description)
Line 55: Line 55:
  
 
'''Source:''' [[Knowledge Management for Nuclear Research and Development Organizations]]
 
'''Source:''' [[Knowledge Management for Nuclear Research and Development Organizations]]
 
==Description==
 
 
Nuclear knowledge is that [[Knowledge|knowledge]] specific or relevant to nuclear-related activities, including at least technical engineering knowledge. Nuclear knowledge can have various owners today at various levels. A wide variety of stakeholders can claim interest in managing, [[Use|using]], applying, developing and [[Sharing|sharing]] knowledge — each with specific objectives, requirements and limitations. These stakeholders include:
 
#[[Government organizations|Governments]], including industry regulators;
 
#Designers, vendors, utilities, [[Operating organizations|operators]], suppliers, consultants and support organizations;
 
#Training and [[Academic organizations|academic]] institutions;
 
#R&D organizations;
 
#The public and non-governmental organizations (NGOs);
 
#International organizations.
 
 
Over the last sixty years, technology has enabled this knowledge base to grow exponentially. Humankind has moved from the industrial revolution to the information revolution, and now to the knowledge revolution. Employees have evolved from worker to knowledge worker, and competitive organizations have recognized that knowledge is a valuable resource to be managed.
 
 
Nuclear knowledge (NK) is unique especially with regard to safety considerations. Specific physical properties of nuclear power processes and severe damage from nuclear accidents promoted such specific area of NK as risk analysis. Now it is the only numerical method for nuclear facilities safety assessment. IAEA document  established acceptable risk level for operating and new nuclear power plants (NPP) — (10-4–10-5) severe core damage events per plant operating year.
 
 
And so nuclear knowledge is ‘a must’ base for responsible decision making on nuclear energy programmes, especially relevant to ‘embarking’ countries during Phase 1
 
 
'''Source:''' [[Guide on nuclear knowledge management]]
 
  
 
==Description==
 
==Description==

Revision as of 17:51, 6 November 2013

Template:Zoltan Template:Monica

Template:DavidBeraha

Tidy1.png
1 Clustering stage banner.jpg,

Priority.png,

Template:Foundation,

Content.png,

Template:Pages

Definition

Nuclear knowledge is Knowledge in the nuclear domain. Nuclear knowledge is characterised by a unique combination of factors which make the management of it particularly challenging, these are: fragmentation, safety, complexity, government involvement, high costs, long timescales, international cooperation and education.

Summary

...

Description

A wide variety of stakeholders will legitimately claim an interest in managing, using, applying, developing and sharing nuclear knowledge — each with their own objectives, requirements, and limitations.

Nuclear knowledge is unique in many ways — different from knowledge developed and used in other industrial domains. It is complex, involving high development costs often requiring significant governmental support. Nuclear knowledge must be developed and retained over long time frames to service operational nuclear facilities and over even longer time frames to enable global sustainable growth. Special constraints exist due to the dual (peaceful and non-peaceful) nature of nuclear technology, and these characteristics have often led to serious public concerns. As further elucidated below, these unique characteristics make efforts to effectively manage nuclear knowledge most desirable or even mandatory.

In response to an increased awareness of the importance to manage nuclear knowledge in many Member States, the IAEA has published a number of technical guidance documents (including nuclear management objectives [9]) containing the highest level issues for knowledge management that are commonly agreed as being relevant and applicable to activities in the nuclear sector.

Basic scientific nuclear knowledge has been accumulating for around one hundred years but this has been further enhanced through practical experience of its application over the last sixty years. The combination of this ‘pure and applied’ nuclear knowledge has brought our understanding to its current mature stage, with significant contributions being made to a wide variety of secondary applications. However, this extensive portfolio of nuclear knowledge — often derived with government support — is beginning to exceed present commercial demand with the consequence that some of it is in danger of being permanently lost. The risk is compounded by the fact that there is an absence of effective systems for transferring the knowledge between successive generations.

Nuclear knowledge is different from the knowledge developed and used in other industrial domains. It is very complex and has high investment costs, which often require massive governmental support. It must be developed and retained over very long timescales to service operational nuclear facilities and even longer timescales to enable global sustainable growth. Special constraints exist to limit its unrestricted dissemination, due to the dual (civil and military) uses of nuclear technology. These unique characteristics mean that there is an unwritten obligation for the industry to effectively manage nuclear knowledge.

Complexity

High costs

Long term development and utilization

Importance of international cooperation

Nuclear knowledge has been used successfully in the past by many countries as a catalyst for socioeconomic development. It is becoming increasingly clear that a wide range of benefits can be obtained from the appropriate use of nuclear power and other nuclear applications. However, the ‘appropriate’ use presupposes a certain level of maturity in the industrial and societal context, especially in terms of accountability and decision making systems and a general awareness and understanding of nuclear issues beyond mere technological aspects. Hence, it is not surprising that international cooperation has played a crucial role in the development of nuclear knowledge right from the very beginning of its application for civilian purposes. Indeed, the importance of international cooperation to any country embarking on a nuclear programme today is a unique characteristic of nuclear science and technology.

Balance between sharing and protection

The inherently dual nature of nuclear technology necessitates constraints on the sharing of nuclear knowledge. In contrast to knowledge in other scientific domains, the sharing and use of nuclear knowledge are restricted due to concerns about nuclear safeguards and proliferation. On the other hand, ensuring safety requires ready availability of high quality, well documented experience and knowledge. The risk to nuclear safety from the loss of or lack of access to nuclear knowledge could be very high. Thus an appropriate balance between nuclear safety and safeguard requirements needs to be established in managing nuclear knowledge.

Government involvement

Owing to the long term return on investment compared with other industries, as well as safety, security and non-proliferation issues, a high level of government involvement and close monitoring of activities is essential during the development, application and transfer of nuclear knowledge. This involvement is necessary not only to underwrite a large portion of the development cost but also to manage nuclear liability (including its trans boundary nature), nuclear safety concerns and the prevention of nuclear knowledge misuse under all circumstances.

Source: Knowledge management for radioactive waste management organisations

Source: Guide on nuclear knowledge management

Description

Template:Characteristics of nuclear knowledge

Source: Knowledge Management for Nuclear Research and Development Organizations

Description

Broad spectrum of knowledge is that gained from each phase of the disposal facility operation (site investigations through to disposal facility closure), the totality of the materials (active and non-active) contained within the disposal facility and relevant contextual information. The need to access information, once it has been recorded, must be a high priority.

Source: Knowledge management for radioactive waste management organisations

Other related articles

Knowledge

Nuclear knowledge management

Historical development of nuclear knowledge

Current status of nuclear knowledge

Nuclear organizations and nuclear knowledge

Nuclear knowledge sources

Nuclear organizations and nuclear knowledge