Difference between revisions of "Consensus decision making"

From NKM WIKIDOC
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
<!--
 
{{JohnD}}
 
{{JohnD}}
 
{{Tidy1}}
 
{{Tidy1}}
  
 
{{Clustering stage}}
 
{{Clustering stage}}
 +
-->
  
 
==Definition==
 
==Definition==
 
{{PAGENAME}} is {{ {{PAGENAME}} }}
 
{{PAGENAME}} is {{ {{PAGENAME}} }}
'''Source:''' [[]]
 
 
== Summary==
 
One paragraph which summarises the main ideas of the article.
 
  
 
== Description==
 
== Description==
Line 18: Line 16:
 
* This method is democratic in nature;  
 
* This method is democratic in nature;  
 
* This method can be sometimes tedious and can take hours.
 
* This method can be sometimes tedious and can take hours.
 
'''Source:''' [[National approaches and strategies for Nuclear Knowledge Management]]
 
 
==References==
 
  
 
==Related articles==
 
==Related articles==
Line 27: Line 21:
 
[[Brainstorming]]
 
[[Brainstorming]]
  
[[Decision summary]]
 
 
[[Decision support system]]
 
 
[[Knowledge or risk informed decision processes]]
 
 
[[Optimal decision]]
 
 
[[Capture tools]]
 
 
[[Capture]]
 
  
 
[[Category:Knowledge management method]]
 
[[Category:Knowledge management method]]

Revision as of 12:27, 8 February 2015


Definition

Consensus decision making is Arriving at a decision within a team

Description

  • Consensus decision making usually follows brainstorming;
  • It is effective if and only if each expert has been provided with equal and adequate opportunity to present their views;
  • In order to arrive at a consensus, the knowledge developer conducting the exercise tries to rally the experts towards one or two alternatives;
  • The knowledge developer follows a procedure designed to ensure fairness and standardization;
  • This method is democratic in nature;
  • This method can be sometimes tedious and can take hours.

Related articles

Brainstorming