Difference between revisions of "After action review"
DavidBeraha (Talk | contribs) (→Related articles) |
DavidBeraha (Talk | contribs) (→References) |
||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
==== [[Conducting an After-action review#Critical success factors | Critical success factors]]==== | ==== [[Conducting an After-action review#Critical success factors | Critical success factors]]==== | ||
==== [[Conducting an After-action review#Case studies | Case studies]]==== | ==== [[Conducting an After-action review#Case studies | Case studies]]==== | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
==Related articles== | ==Related articles== | ||
Revision as of 10:00, 8 February 2015
Contents
Definition
An After action review is A method used to capture and evaluate lessons learned from an action, project or activity. (Last published: A process that involves conducting a structured and facilitated discussion after a task or project has been completed to review what should have happened; what actually happened; and, where differences exist, why it happened)
Description
The after action review is a simple process used by a team to capture the lessons learned from past successes and failures with the goal of improving future performance. It is an opportunity for a team to reflect on a project, activity, event or task so that the next time, they can do better. The review will not only make learning conscious within a team but it can also help build trust amongst the team’s members. Intended audience and required skill for delivery. Participants of an after action review should include all members of the team. A competent and neutral facilitator should be appointed to help create an open environment, promote discussion and draw out lessons learned.
