Difference between revisions of "After action review"
(→Related articles) |
DavidBeraha (Talk | contribs) (→Definition) |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
==Definition== | ==Definition== | ||
| − | + | {{ {{PAGENAME}} }} | |
== Description == | == Description == | ||
Revision as of 09:59, 21 December 2015
Definition
A method used to capture and evaluate lessons learned from an action, project or activity. (Last published: A process that involves conducting a structured and facilitated discussion after a task or project has been completed to review what should have happened; what actually happened; and, where differences exist, why it happened)
Description
The after action review is a simple process used by a team to capture the lessons learned from past successes and failures with the goal of improving future performance. It is an opportunity for a team to reflect on a project, activity, event or task so that the next time, they can do better. The review will not only make learning conscious within a team but it can also help build trust amongst the team’s members. Intended audience and required skill for delivery. Participants of an after action review should include all members of the team. A competent and neutral facilitator should be appointed to help create an open environment, promote discussion and draw out lessons learned.
