Difference between revisions of "Assessment of organizational competency"
(→Description) |
|||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
One paragraph which summarises the main ideas of the article. | One paragraph which summarises the main ideas of the article. | ||
| − | ==Description== | + | == Description== |
| − | + | How can the competence of an individual organization be assessed? There are several methods that can be used for assessment and the main methods are described below. | |
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | ===[[ | + | ====Self-assessment of human, organizational and technical capital==== |
| + | [[Self-assessment]] in this area first involves identifying the key factors and [[Good practice|good practices]] which relate to the above aspects. A maturity model can then be designed based on best practice and a simple scoring scale established which considers current and future desired performance. Gap analysis is then used to help identify strengths and weaknesses. | ||
| + | For the different types of nuclear organization, the organizational competency information provided in Appendices A to D can be used to help construct the analysis models. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ====Operational benchmarking (with similar organizations)==== | ||
| + | This is a [[Benchmarking|benchmarking]] methodology which directly compares human, organizational and technical capital between similar organizations. It can be carried out within a single country if there exists two or more organizations performing a similar function. If this is not possible (e.g. for a regulatory body) then inter-country collaboration will be needed. The benchmarking process involves a detailed analysis of the three areas and identifies good practices in each of the organisations. | ||
| + | |||
| + | It is outside the scope of this document to describe the details of the benchmarking process. Many good references exist which describes this technique (See reference 4) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ====Audit and [[Peer review|peer review]]==== | ||
| + | This is similar to the benchmarking process but involves an industry expert or experts familiar with the subject matter that is capable of auditing the human, organizational and technical capital areas. As with QA and similar audits, an approach using a pre-established check-list is recommended. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ====Use of key performance indicators (KPIs)==== | ||
| + | KPIs can be used to directly measure parameters related to human, organizational and technical capital. Such a method will often yield a trend of information that can readily be used to assess performance and guide future improvement policy. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ====Standard organizational performance models (e.g. EFQM)==== | ||
| + | The EFQM model (reference 5) provides an already well-established route for determining organizational performance. Although this is not quite the same as organizational competence, many of the areas of the model (e.g. the effectiveness of organizational processes) relate directly to organizational capital | ||
| + | |||
| + | '''Source:''' [[Mapping organizational competency in nuclear organizations]] - Nov 2012 draft | ||
'''Source:''' [[Mapping organizational competency in nuclear organizations]] - Nov 2012 draft | '''Source:''' [[Mapping organizational competency in nuclear organizations]] - Nov 2012 draft | ||
Revision as of 15:51, 28 October 2013
,
,
Definition
Assessment of organizational competency is Using various methods and tools to identify the gaps in the current organizational competencies Source: [[]]
Summary
One paragraph which summarises the main ideas of the article.
Description
How can the competence of an individual organization be assessed? There are several methods that can be used for assessment and the main methods are described below.
Self-assessment of human, organizational and technical capital
Self-assessment in this area first involves identifying the key factors and good practices which relate to the above aspects. A maturity model can then be designed based on best practice and a simple scoring scale established which considers current and future desired performance. Gap analysis is then used to help identify strengths and weaknesses. For the different types of nuclear organization, the organizational competency information provided in Appendices A to D can be used to help construct the analysis models.
Operational benchmarking (with similar organizations)
This is a benchmarking methodology which directly compares human, organizational and technical capital between similar organizations. It can be carried out within a single country if there exists two or more organizations performing a similar function. If this is not possible (e.g. for a regulatory body) then inter-country collaboration will be needed. The benchmarking process involves a detailed analysis of the three areas and identifies good practices in each of the organisations.
It is outside the scope of this document to describe the details of the benchmarking process. Many good references exist which describes this technique (See reference 4)
Audit and peer review
This is similar to the benchmarking process but involves an industry expert or experts familiar with the subject matter that is capable of auditing the human, organizational and technical capital areas. As with QA and similar audits, an approach using a pre-established check-list is recommended.
Use of key performance indicators (KPIs)
KPIs can be used to directly measure parameters related to human, organizational and technical capital. Such a method will often yield a trend of information that can readily be used to assess performance and guide future improvement policy.
Standard organizational performance models (e.g. EFQM)
The EFQM model (reference 5) provides an already well-established route for determining organizational performance. Although this is not quite the same as organizational competence, many of the areas of the model (e.g. the effectiveness of organizational processes) relate directly to organizational capital
Source: Mapping organizational competency in nuclear organizations - Nov 2012 draft
Source: Mapping organizational competency in nuclear organizations - Nov 2012 draft
References
[4] Benchmarking for Competitive Advantage. Robert J Boxwell Jr, New York: McGraw-Hill. 1994. pp. 225. ISBN 0-07-006899-2. http://www.amazon.com/Benchmarking-Competitive-Advantage-Robert-Boxwell/dp/0070068992.
[5] The EFQM Excellence Model http://www.efqm.org/en/tabid/132/default.aspx
