Difference between revisions of "Knowledge loss risk assessment in NPP's"
(→Attrition related knowledge loss risk assessment) |
(→Attrition related knowledge loss risk assessment) |
||
| Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
knowledge retention process. Knowledge retention roles and responsibilities | knowledge retention process. Knowledge retention roles and responsibilities | ||
are outlined in Annex I. | are outlined in Annex I. | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[File:Critical-knowledge-flow.PNG|thumb|right|500px|Fig 1. Critical knowledge retention flow chart]] | ||
=== The three step process === | === The three step process === | ||
Revision as of 12:44, 28 June 2013
Contents
Definition
One sentence definition. A template can be used for definition.
Summary
One paragaph summary which summarises the main ideas of the article.
Description
The following processes and tools can be used by nuclear power plants to identify and mitigate knowledge loss threats. Management can adapt or modify these processes and tools to meet the specific needs of their organization.
Attrition related knowledge loss threats can be identified, prioritized and addressed using the following process to determine a total risk factor for each employee in the organization. This total risk factor is based on a projected attrition date, which could be retirement, transfer, or other attrition (attrition risk factor), and criticality of knowledge and skill (position risk factor). This three step process has been succesfully implemented by the Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) in the USA. Figure 1 is a flow diagram of the critical knowledge retention process. Knowledge retention roles and responsibilities are outlined in Annex I.
The three step process
Employee self-assessment–knowledge retention process
Risk management of institutional knowledge loss
Source: Risk Management of Knowledge Loss in Nuclear Industry Organizations
References
[1]
