Difference between revisions of "Observation"
m |
|||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
==Definition== | ==Definition== | ||
| − | |||
{{PAGENAME}} is {{ {{PAGENAME}} }} | {{PAGENAME}} is {{ {{PAGENAME}} }} | ||
| + | '''Source:''' [[]] | ||
== Summary== | == Summary== | ||
| + | One paragraph summary which summarises the main ideas of the article. | ||
| − | + | == Description== | |
| − | + | ||
| − | == Description | + | |
| − | + | ||
Observational techniques are another valuable means of capturing [[Tacit knowledge|tacit knowledge]]. These | Observational techniques are another valuable means of capturing [[Tacit knowledge|tacit knowledge]]. These | ||
techniques are particularly useful when trying to capture special skills (e.g. calibration | techniques are particularly useful when trying to capture special skills (e.g. calibration | ||
| Line 17: | Line 15: | ||
with interviewing and other techniques. In general, simple observation techniques are rarely | with interviewing and other techniques. In general, simple observation techniques are rarely | ||
used, as they are an inefficient means of capturing the required knowledge. | used, as they are an inefficient means of capturing the required knowledge. | ||
| − | |||
'''Source:''' | '''Source:''' | ||
[[Knowledge Management for Nuclear Research and Development Organizations]] | [[Knowledge Management for Nuclear Research and Development Organizations]] | ||
| − | ==Description | + | ==Description== |
| − | + | ||
* It is a process which involves observing, recording, and interpreting the expert's problem-solving process while it takes place; | * It is a process which involves observing, recording, and interpreting the expert's problem-solving process while it takes place; | ||
* The knowledge developer does more listening than talking; avoids giving advice and usually does not pass his/her own judgment on what is being observed, even if it seems incorrect; and most of all, does not argue with the expert while the expert is performing the task; | * The knowledge developer does more listening than talking; avoids giving advice and usually does not pass his/her own judgment on what is being observed, even if it seems incorrect; and most of all, does not argue with the expert while the expert is performing the task; | ||
| Line 34: | Line 30: | ||
== References == | == References == | ||
| − | |||
==Related articles== | ==Related articles== | ||
| Line 41: | Line 36: | ||
[[Capture]] | [[Capture]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[Tacit knowledge]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[Interview]] | ||
[[Category:Tools]] | [[Category:Tools]] | ||
Revision as of 14:57, 19 August 2013
Definition
Observation is a means of knowledge capture whereby an expert is observed performing a task and subsequently questioned. Source: [[]]
Summary
One paragraph summary which summarises the main ideas of the article.
Description
Observational techniques are another valuable means of capturing tacit knowledge. These techniques are particularly useful when trying to capture special skills (e.g. calibration techniques, equipment set-up and operation, specialist welding etc.). Simply observing and making notes as the expert performs their daily activities can be useful, although this is a timeconsuming process. Videotaping task performance can also be helpful, especially if combined with interviewing and other techniques. In general, simple observation techniques are rarely used, as they are an inefficient means of capturing the required knowledge.
Source: Knowledge Management for Nuclear Research and Development Organizations
Description
- It is a process which involves observing, recording, and interpreting the expert's problem-solving process while it takes place;
- The knowledge developer does more listening than talking; avoids giving advice and usually does not pass his/her own judgment on what is being observed, even if it seems incorrect; and most of all, does not argue with the expert while the expert is performing the task;
- Compared to the process of interviewing, on-site observation brings the knowledge developer closer to the actual steps, techniques, and procedures used by the expert;
- One disadvantage is that sometimes experts do not like the idea of being observed.
- The reaction of other people (in the observation setting) can also be a problem causing distraction;
- Another disadvantage is the accuracy/completeness of the captured knowledge.
Source: National approaches and strategies for Nuclear Knowledge Management
