Difference between revisions of "Benchmarking"
From NKM WIKIDOC
(→Definition) |
(→Definition) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Clustering stage}} | {{Clustering stage}} | ||
==Definition== | ==Definition== | ||
| + | |||
{{PAGENAME}} is/are {{ {{PAGENAME}} }} | {{PAGENAME}} is/are {{ {{PAGENAME}} }} | ||
| Line 8: | Line 9: | ||
'''Source:''' [[Process oriented knowledge management]] | '''Source:''' [[Process oriented knowledge management]] | ||
| − | |||
{{PAGENAME}} is {{ {{PAGENAME}} 2 }} | {{PAGENAME}} is {{ {{PAGENAME}} 2 }} | ||
Revision as of 14:48, 11 July 2013
Definition
Benchmarking is/are The practice of comparing features and performance of an organization, department or function with those of other organizations and standards.
Source: Comparative Analysis of Methods and Tools for Nuclear Knowledge Preservation
Benchmarking is/are Template:Benchmarking 3
Source: Process oriented knowledge management
Benchmarking is Template:Benchmarking 2
Source: Planning and Execution of Knowledge Management Assist Missions for Nuclear Organizations
Summary
Description 1
The following axioms should be considered in benchmarking:
- What works well for a given organization in one situation may not work well in another organization under different circumstances.
- There are lessons to be learned from undesirable situations as well as from best practices – things that have been proven to work well and produce good results.
- Examining the practices of organizations with fundamentally different aims can produce surprisingly useful insight about another organization.
Source: Planning and Execution of Knowledge Management Assist Missions for Nuclear Organizations
Description 2
References
[1]
