Difference between revisions of "Action review"
DavidBeraha (Talk | contribs) |
DavidBeraha (Talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | <!-- | ||
{{JohnD}} | {{JohnD}} | ||
| Line 5: | Line 6: | ||
{{Clustering stage}}, | {{Clustering stage}}, | ||
| + | {{Content}} | ||
| + | --> | ||
| − | |||
==Definition== | ==Definition== | ||
{{PAGENAME}} is {{ {{PAGENAME}} }} | {{PAGENAME}} is {{ {{PAGENAME}} }} | ||
| − | '''Source''': [[Comparative Analysis of Methods and Tools for Nuclear Knowledge Preservation]] | + | <!-- '''Source''': [[Comparative Analysis of Methods and Tools for Nuclear Knowledge Preservation]] --> |
| − | == | + | == Description == |
The After Action Review (AAR) is a simple process used by a team to capture the lessons learned from past successes and failures with the goal of improving future performance. It is an opportunity for a team to reflect on a project, activity, event or task so that the next time, they can do better. The AAR will not only make learning conscious within a team but it can also help build trust amongst the team’s members. Intended audience and required skill for delivery Participants of an AAR should include all members of the team. A competent and neutral facilitator should be appointed to help create an open environment, promote discussion and draw out lessons learned. | The After Action Review (AAR) is a simple process used by a team to capture the lessons learned from past successes and failures with the goal of improving future performance. It is an opportunity for a team to reflect on a project, activity, event or task so that the next time, they can do better. The AAR will not only make learning conscious within a team but it can also help build trust amongst the team’s members. Intended audience and required skill for delivery Participants of an AAR should include all members of the team. A competent and neutral facilitator should be appointed to help create an open environment, promote discussion and draw out lessons learned. | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
==Related articles== | ==Related articles== | ||
[[After action review]] | [[After action review]] | ||
[[Category:Review]] | [[Category:Review]] | ||
Revision as of 09:24, 8 February 2015
Definition
Action review is A quick and simple team learning process held while work is being performed, usually during a break in the task or activity.
Description
The After Action Review (AAR) is a simple process used by a team to capture the lessons learned from past successes and failures with the goal of improving future performance. It is an opportunity for a team to reflect on a project, activity, event or task so that the next time, they can do better. The AAR will not only make learning conscious within a team but it can also help build trust amongst the team’s members. Intended audience and required skill for delivery Participants of an AAR should include all members of the team. A competent and neutral facilitator should be appointed to help create an open environment, promote discussion and draw out lessons learned.
