Difference between revisions of "Knowledge management"

From NKM WIKIDOC
Jump to: navigation, search
(Description)
 
(48 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
<!--
 
{{Zoltan}}
 
{{Zoltan}}
  
 
{{DavidBeraha}}
 
{{DavidBeraha}}
 +
 +
{{Complete}},
  
 
{{Consolidation stage}},
 
{{Consolidation stage}},
Line 8: Line 11:
  
 
{{Foundation}},
 
{{Foundation}},
 
+
-->
{{Content}}
+
  
 
==Definition==
 
==Definition==
{{PAGENAME}} is {{ {{PAGENAME}} }}
+
{{ {{PAGENAME}} }}
  
 
== Summary==
 
== Summary==
 +
Knowledge management is by now well established and widely adopted, and documented in a vast body of literature. The IAEA defines Knowledge Management as coordinated, integrated, systemic practices and activities which enable and promote effective knowledge processes and ensure adequate knowledge assets as needed to achieve organizational goals. The KM model adopted contains three primary elements: people, processes and technology and the surrounding and proper organization [[Organizational culture|culture]]. ''Note: Although KM is typically understood in an organizational context as integrated into management system. It can also be applied in several contexts such as e.g. personal, national.''
  
 
== Description==
 
== Description==
Knowledge Management emerged as a scientific discipline in the earlier 1990s. Since then, a vast body of literature and innumerable Internet links covering a broad range of thoughts on the KM discipline including manifold practical experiences have been established. An overview on all relevant aspects of general (not organization or domain specific) Knowledge Management may be found in [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Knowledge_management Wikipedia].
+
Knowledge Management emerged as a scientific discipline in the earlier 1990s. Since then, a vast body of literature with fundamental textbooks as well as a large number of Internet links covering a broad range of thoughts on the KM discipline including manifold practical experiences have been established. An overview on many relevant aspects of general (not organization or domain specific) Knowledge Management may be found in [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Knowledge_management Wikipedia].
  
The IAEA defines knowledge management as: “an integrated and systematic approach for [[Identification|identifying]], [[Acquisition|acquiring]], [[Transformation|transforming]], developing, [[Dissemination|disseminating]], [[Use|using]], and [[Preservation|preserving]] the [[Critical knowledge|knowledge that is critical]] to an individual or organization in achieving specified objectives”.  
+
A number of knowledge management models have been developed and deployed in the development of a knowledge management system. There are two knowledge management reference models used by the IAEA  to explain the concept of knowledge management . The first [[Fraunhofer reference model|Fraunhofer Reference Model for Knowledge Management]] helps to understand in a simple manner how knowledge management supports organizational business processes. The second model demonstrates the 3 sides of knowledge management which should be aliened among each other and organizational environment to make knowledge management effective. Knowledge management focuses on people and [[Organizational culture|organizational culture]] to stimulate and nurture the sharing and use of knowledge; on processes or methods to find, create, capture and share knowledge; and on technology to store and make knowledge accessible and to allow people to work together without being together. People are the most important component, because managing knowledge depends upon people’s willingness to share and reuse knowledge (See Fig 1) [1]. [[File:Components of a KM system.png|thumbnail|right|400px|Fig 1. Primary KM elements and organizational context]].  
  
The knowledge management approach in business is prompted by the combination of three primary elements — people, processes, and technology — operating within a culture that recognizes the importance of knowledge to the success and safety of all (see Fig. 1). These three elements are shortly characterized as: [[File:PPT.PNG|thumb|right|500px|Fig 1. Primary KM elements and organisational context]]
 
  
* KM focuses on people and the organizational culture required to stimulate and nurture the sharing and use of knowledge, on processes or methods to find, create, capture and share knowledge, and on the technologyneeded to store and make knowledge accessible and to allow people to work together without being together
+
It is important to recognize knowledge in organizations exists at an individual level, at a group level, at a department level, and at an organizational level. Further, the level of abstraction and form of knowledge may range from detailed facts, to organized information, to interpretations and analysis, to conceptualizations, to theoretical models, or even wisdom. Knowledge can be considered a resource (i.e. an input), it may be embedded in work methods (i.e. part of a process) or it can be a product (i.e. an output). Knowledge may often be time dependent or contextual, and must be maintained and renewed. [2] Consequently knowledge management should be practiced on all these levels.
* KM focuses on processes or methods which find, create, capture and share knowledge. Established operational processes are essential to safely operating and maintaining nuclear facilities. KM must be integrated into business processes such as strategic planning, analysis and decision making, implementation of plans, and evaluation of results
+
* KM focuses on technology to store and make knowledge accessible, which allows people to work together irrespective of location or time. Thus, technology is an important enabler to the success of KM
+
  
=== [[NKM and people|People]] ===
+
On organizational level every knowledge management initiative should start with the development of the own [[Knowledge management strategy]] which is aligned with the overall organizational strategy.
+
=== [[KM processes|Processes]] ===
+
  
=== [[NKM and technology|Technology]] ===
+
==References==
 +
[1] INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY, Knowledge Management for Nuclear Industry Operating Organizations,
 +
IAEA-TECDOC-1510, IAEA, Vienna (2006).
  
=== [[Culture]] ===
+
[2] INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY, The Impact of Knowledge Management Practices on NPP Organizational Performance — Results of a Global Survey, IAEA-TECDOC-1711,IAEA, Vienna (2013).
 
+
== References ==
+
[4] Discussion of people, processes and technology from Managing Knowledge & Work: An Overview of Knowledge Management, PLUNKETT P.T. (author) for the Knowledge Management Working Group of the Federal Chief Information Officers’ Council, US General Services Administration, Washington, DC (2001).
+
 
+
[8] O’LEARY, D., Enterprise knowledge management, IEEE Computer 31 3 (1998) 54–61.
+
 
+
[9] NEWMAN, B., Agents, Artefacts, and Transformations: The Foundations of Knowledge Flows, Handbook of Knowledge
+
Management, Springer 1 (2003) 301–316.
+
 
+
[10] ALAVI, M., LEIDNER, D., Knowledge management systems: Issues, challenges and benefits, Communications of AIS 1 7
+
(1999) 49–63.
+
 
+
[11] ANDRIESSEN, D., IC valuation and measurement, classifying the state of the art, J. Intellectual Capital 5 2 (2004) 230–242.
+
 
+
[12] HEDLUND, G., A model of knowledge management and the n-form corporation, Strat. Manage. J. 15 special issue (1994)
+
73–90.
+
 
+
[13] INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY, Nuclear Knowledge Management Glossary, IAEA, Vienna (2005).
+
 
+
 
+
[3] HEDLUND, G.A., Model of knowledge management and the n-form corporation, Strategic Management
+
Journal, 15, (1994) 73–90.
+
 
+
[4] ANDRIESSEN, D., TISSEN, R., Weightless Wealth: find your real value in a future of intangible assets,  
+
1st edn, Financial Times Management, London (2000) 256 pp.
+
 
+
[5] JANTUNEN, A., Knowledge-processing capabilities and innovative performance: an empirical study,
+
European Journal of Innovation Management, 8, 3, (2005) 336–349.
+
 
+
[6] CARLUCCI1, D., SCHIUMA, G., Knowledge asset value spiral: linking knowledge assets to company‘s
+
performance, Knowledge and Process Management, 13, 1, (2006) 35–46.
+
 
+
[7] DARROCH, J., Knowledge management, innovation and firm performance, Journal of Knowledge
+
Management, 9, 3, (2005) 101–115.
+
 
+
[8] MALHOTRA, Y., Integrating knowledge management technologies in organizational business processes:
+
getting real time enterprises to deliver real business performance, Journal of Knowledge Management, 9,
+
1 (2005).
+
 
+
[9] FIRESTONE, J.M., MCELROY, M.W., Organizational learning and knowledge management: the
+
relationship, The Learning Organization, 11, 2, (2004) 177–184.
+
 
+
[10] CHANG, S.G., AHN, J.H., Product and process knowledge in the performance-oriented knowledge
+
management approach, Journal of Knowledge Management, 9, 4, (2005) 114–132.  
+
  
 
==Related articles==
 
==Related articles==
Line 87: Line 43:
 
[[Nuclear knowledge management]]
 
[[Nuclear knowledge management]]
  
[[NKM and people]]
 
 
[[NKM and technology]]
 
 
[[Implementation]]
 
 
[[Challenges]]
 
 
[[Benefits]]
 
 
[[KM and quality management system]]
 
 
[[KM arrangements]]
 
 
[[KM assessments]]
 
 
[[KM assist mission]]
 
 
[[KM contingency plans]]
 
 
[[KM development]]
 
 
[[KM economics]]
 
 
[[KM elements]]
 
 
[[KM performance model]]
 
 
[[KM practices]]
 
 
[[KM processes]]
 
 
[[KM strategy]]
 
 
[[KM system]]
 
 
[[KM solution]]
 
 
[[Life cycle of knowledge management]]
 
  
[[Category:Knowledge]]
+
[[Category:Knowledge management]]
[[Category:KM systems]]
+

Latest revision as of 09:05, 7 April 2016


Definition

Coordinated, integrated, systemic practices and activities which enable and promote effective knowledge processes and ensure adequate knowledge assets as needed to achieve organizational goals. (Last published: an integrated, systematic approach to identifying, acquiring, transforming, developing, disseminating, using, sharing, and preserving knowledge, relevant to achieving specified objectives)

Summary

Knowledge management is by now well established and widely adopted, and documented in a vast body of literature. The IAEA defines Knowledge Management as coordinated, integrated, systemic practices and activities which enable and promote effective knowledge processes and ensure adequate knowledge assets as needed to achieve organizational goals. The KM model adopted contains three primary elements: people, processes and technology and the surrounding and proper organization culture. Note: Although KM is typically understood in an organizational context as integrated into management system. It can also be applied in several contexts such as e.g. personal, national.

Description

Knowledge Management emerged as a scientific discipline in the earlier 1990s. Since then, a vast body of literature with fundamental textbooks as well as a large number of Internet links covering a broad range of thoughts on the KM discipline including manifold practical experiences have been established. An overview on many relevant aspects of general (not organization or domain specific) Knowledge Management may be found in Wikipedia.

A number of knowledge management models have been developed and deployed in the development of a knowledge management system. There are two knowledge management reference models used by the IAEA to explain the concept of knowledge management . The first Fraunhofer Reference Model for Knowledge Management helps to understand in a simple manner how knowledge management supports organizational business processes. The second model demonstrates the 3 sides of knowledge management which should be aliened among each other and organizational environment to make knowledge management effective. Knowledge management focuses on people and organizational culture to stimulate and nurture the sharing and use of knowledge; on processes or methods to find, create, capture and share knowledge; and on technology to store and make knowledge accessible and to allow people to work together without being together. People are the most important component, because managing knowledge depends upon people’s willingness to share and reuse knowledge (See Fig 1) [1].
Fig 1. Primary KM elements and organizational context
.


It is important to recognize knowledge in organizations exists at an individual level, at a group level, at a department level, and at an organizational level. Further, the level of abstraction and form of knowledge may range from detailed facts, to organized information, to interpretations and analysis, to conceptualizations, to theoretical models, or even wisdom. Knowledge can be considered a resource (i.e. an input), it may be embedded in work methods (i.e. part of a process) or it can be a product (i.e. an output). Knowledge may often be time dependent or contextual, and must be maintained and renewed. [2] Consequently knowledge management should be practiced on all these levels.

On organizational level every knowledge management initiative should start with the development of the own Knowledge management strategy which is aligned with the overall organizational strategy.

References

[1] INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY, Knowledge Management for Nuclear Industry Operating Organizations, IAEA-TECDOC-1510, IAEA, Vienna (2006).

[2] INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY, The Impact of Knowledge Management Practices on NPP Organizational Performance — Results of a Global Survey, IAEA-TECDOC-1711,IAEA, Vienna (2013).

Related articles

Knowledge

Nuclear knowledge

Nuclear knowledge management