Difference between revisions of "Intellectual property"
From NKM WIKIDOC
(Created page with "{{Clustering stage}} ==Definition== {{PAGENAME}} is {{ {{PAGENAME}} }} '''Source: ''' [[Planning and Execution of Knowledge Management Assist Missions for Nuclear Organizatio...") |
DavidBeraha (Talk | contribs) (→Definition) |
||
| (35 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | {{ | + | <!-- |
| + | {{JohnD}} | ||
| + | |||
| + | {{Complete}}, | ||
| + | |||
| + | {{Consolidation stage}}, | ||
| + | --> | ||
| + | |||
==Definition== | ==Definition== | ||
| − | + | {{ {{PAGENAME}} }} | |
| + | <!-- '''Source: ''' [[Planning and Execution of Knowledge Management Assist Missions for Nuclear Organizations]] --> | ||
| − | '''Source: ''' [[ | + | == Description== |
| − | + | Intellectual property (IP) is an [[Intangible asset|intangible asset]] that has commercial value. In nuclear R&D | |
| − | + | organizations the development of IP is a key deliverable of the organization and as such | |
| − | + | should be protected. As well as physical assets such as designs, inventions, software etc. | |
| − | + | ‘employee know-how’ is also regarded as IP. In fact the value of employee know-how in | |
| + | many R&D organizations far outweighs the value of physical assets. Protecting all kinds of IP | ||
| + | involves: | ||
| + | * Taking an inventory of existing IP; | ||
| + | * Assessing IP value; | ||
| + | * Implementing controls on high value items and then integrating these controls into the management system. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Taking an inventory of ‘employee know-how’ is essentially the same task as [[Identification of critical knowledge|identifying critical knowledge]] in the organization, hence there is an obvious linkage here with the KM | ||
| + | tools and techniques described in Section 6 of this publication. | ||
| + | # Applicable organizational functions; | ||
| + | #* All types of R&D organization, but with particular relevance to: | ||
| + | #** Applied research functions; | ||
| + | #** Design R&D functions; | ||
| + | #** Technical support & services functions. | ||
| + | # Related KM tools/techniques to consider: | ||
| + | #* [[Identification of critical knowledge]]; | ||
| + | #*[[ Knowledge loss risk assessment]]; | ||
| + | #* [[Succession planning]]; | ||
| + | #* [[Tacit knowledge]] capture; | ||
| + | #* [[Explicit knowledge]] search/find; | ||
| + | #* IT tools to facilitate the techniques above. | ||
| + | |||
| + | <!-- '''Source:''' [[Knowledge Management for Nuclear Research and Development Organizations]] --> | ||
==Related articles== | ==Related articles== | ||
| − | |||
| − | + | [[Asset management]] | |
| + | |||
| + | [[Intangible asset]] | ||
| + | |||
| − | [[ | + | [[Category:Intangible asset]] |
Latest revision as of 11:05, 21 December 2015
Definition
Explicit knowledge assets that are protected by law including patents, trademarks, copyrights, licenses
Description
Intellectual property (IP) is an intangible asset that has commercial value. In nuclear R&D organizations the development of IP is a key deliverable of the organization and as such should be protected. As well as physical assets such as designs, inventions, software etc. ‘employee know-how’ is also regarded as IP. In fact the value of employee know-how in many R&D organizations far outweighs the value of physical assets. Protecting all kinds of IP involves:
- Taking an inventory of existing IP;
- Assessing IP value;
- Implementing controls on high value items and then integrating these controls into the management system.
Taking an inventory of ‘employee know-how’ is essentially the same task as identifying critical knowledge in the organization, hence there is an obvious linkage here with the KM tools and techniques described in Section 6 of this publication.
- Applicable organizational functions;
- All types of R&D organization, but with particular relevance to:
- Applied research functions;
- Design R&D functions;
- Technical support & services functions.
- All types of R&D organization, but with particular relevance to:
- Related KM tools/techniques to consider:
- Identification of critical knowledge;
- Knowledge loss risk assessment;
- Succession planning;
- Tacit knowledge capture;
- Explicit knowledge search/find;
- IT tools to facilitate the techniques above.
