Difference between revisions of "Brainstorming"
From NKM WIKIDOC
(→Electronic brainstorming) |
DavidBeraha (Talk | contribs) (→Definition) |
||
| (17 intermediate revisions by 7 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | {{ | + | <!-- |
| + | {{JohnD}} | ||
| − | + | {{Tidy1}} | |
| − | {{ | + | {{Clustering stage}}, |
| − | + | {{Links}} | |
| + | --> | ||
| − | == | + | ==Definition== |
| − | + | {{ {{PAGENAME}} }} | |
| − | + | <!-- '''Source:''' [[National approaches and strategies for Nuclear Knowledge Management]] --> | |
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| + | == Description== | ||
* It is an unstructured approach towards generating ideas about creative solution of a problem which involves multiple experts in a session; | * It is an unstructured approach towards generating ideas about creative solution of a problem which involves multiple experts in a session; | ||
* Questions can be raised for clarification, but no evaluations are done at the spot; | * Questions can be raised for clarification, but no evaluations are done at the spot; | ||
| Line 26: | Line 27: | ||
* If the experts are unable to agree on a specific solution, the knowledge developer may call for a vote/consensus. | * If the experts are unable to agree on a specific solution, the knowledge developer may call for a vote/consensus. | ||
| − | + | '''Electronic brainstorming''' | |
| − | + | ||
* It is a computer-aided approach for dealing with multiple experts; | * It is a computer-aided approach for dealing with multiple experts; | ||
* It usually begins with a pre-session plan which identifies objectives and structures the agenda, which is then presented to the experts for approval; | * It usually begins with a pre-session plan which identifies objectives and structures the agenda, which is then presented to the experts for approval; | ||
| Line 38: | Line 38: | ||
* The result is usually the joint ownership of the solution. | * The result is usually the joint ownership of the solution. | ||
| − | + | <!-- '''Source:''' [[National approaches and strategies for Nuclear Knowledge Management]] --> | |
| − | '''Source:''' [[National approaches and strategies for Nuclear Knowledge Management]] | + | |
==References== | ==References== | ||
| Line 45: | Line 44: | ||
==Related articles== | ==Related articles== | ||
| − | [[Category: | + | [[Collaboration]] |
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | [[Category:Knowledge management method]] | ||
Latest revision as of 10:03, 21 December 2015
Definition
An unstructured approach towards generating ideas about creative solution of a problem which involves multiple experts in a session
Description
- It is an unstructured approach towards generating ideas about creative solution of a problem which involves multiple experts in a session;
- Questions can be raised for clarification, but no evaluations are done at the spot;
- Similarities (that emerge through opinions) are usually grouped together logically and evaluated by asking some questions like:
- What benefits are to be gained if a particular idea is followed?
- What specific problems that idea can possibly solve?
- What new problems can arise through this?
- The general procedure for conducting a brainstorming session:
- Introducing the session;
- Presenting the problem to the experts;
- Prompting the experts to generate ideas;
- Looking for signs of possible convergence.
- If the experts are unable to agree on a specific solution, the knowledge developer may call for a vote/consensus.
Electronic brainstorming
- It is a computer-aided approach for dealing with multiple experts;
- It usually begins with a pre-session plan which identifies objectives and structures the agenda, which is then presented to the experts for approval;
- During the session, each expert sits on a PC and gets themselves engaged in a predefined approach towards resolving an issue, and then generates ideas;
- This allows experts to present their opinions through their PCs without having to wait for their turn;
- Usually the comments/suggestions are displayed electronically on a large screen without identifying the source;
- This approach protects the introvert experts and prevents tagging comments to individuals;
- The benefit includes improved communication, effective discussion regarding sensitive issues, and closes the meeting with concise recommendations for necessary action (refer to Fig. 5.1 for the sequence of steps);
- This eventually leads to convergence of ideas and helps to set final specifications;
- The result is usually the joint ownership of the solution.
