Difference between revisions of "Action review"

From NKM WIKIDOC
Jump to: navigation, search
(Definition)
 
(5 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
<!--
 
{{JohnD}}
 
{{JohnD}}
  
Line 5: Line 6:
 
{{Clustering stage}},
 
{{Clustering stage}},
  
 +
{{Content}}
 +
-->
  
  
{{Content}}
 
 
==Definition==
 
==Definition==
{{PAGENAME}} is {{ {{PAGENAME}} }}
+
{{ {{PAGENAME}} }}
'''Source''': [[Comparative Analysis of Methods and Tools for Nuclear Knowledge Preservation]]
+
<!--  '''Source''': [[Comparative Analysis of Methods and Tools for Nuclear Knowledge Preservation]] -->
== Summary==
+
 
The After Action Review (AAR) is a simple process used by a team to capture the lessons learned from past successes and failures with the goal of improving future performance. It is an opportunity for a team to reflect on a project, activity, event or task so that the next time, they can do better. The AAR will not only make learning conscious within a team but it can also help build trust amongst the team’s members. Intended audience and required skill for delivery Participants of an AAR should include all members of the team. A competent and neutral facilitator should be appointed to help create an open environment, promote discussion and draw out lessons learned.
+
== Description==
+
== References ==
+
[1]
+
 
==Related articles==
 
==Related articles==
 
[[After action review]]
 
[[After action review]]
  
[[category:Tools]]
+
[[Category:Review]]

Latest revision as of 09:59, 21 December 2015


Definition

A quick and simple team learning process held while work is being performed, usually during a break in the task or activity.

Related articles

After action review