Difference between revisions of "Knowledge mapping"

From NKM WIKIDOC
Jump to: navigation, search
(Summary)
 
(115 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
<!--
 
{{Tellervo}}
 
{{Tellervo}}
  
{{Comment}}
+
{{Tidy3}},
  
 
{{Consolidation stage}},
 
{{Consolidation stage}},
 +
-->
  
 
==Definition==
 
==Definition==
{{PAGENAME}} is {{ {{PAGENAME}} }}
+
{{ {{PAGENAME}} }}
== Summary==
+
 
Knowledge mapping is a tool to create a [[Knowledge map|knowledge map]].
+
== Purpose and benefit ==
 +
Knowledge mapping is a process which creates a map of a selected knowledge domain, i.e. [[Knowledge map|knowledge map]]. Knowledge mapping can be used as a tool to facilitate [[Knowledge process|knowledge processes]], e.g. [[Learning|learning]], or [[Business process|business processes]], e.g. evaluating the risk of [[Knowledge loss|knowledge loss]]. Knowledge mapping may be performed by just one person, relating to their  personal knowledge or on the level of the whole organisation or anything in between, and it can concentrate on the current situation or have a future oriented view. It helps to see where knowledge resides and where possible gaps are.
  
 
== Description==
 
== Description==
Knowledge mapping is a tool for managing [[Knowledge|knowledge]] or [[Knowledge asset| knowledge assets]] of an organization. It can be used for [[Codification|codification of exiting knowledge]], but sometimes the mapping process itself may [[Creation|create new knowledge]] as well.
+
Knowledge mapping is a [[Process mapping|mapping process]] which can be used for managing [[Knowledge|knowledge]] or [[Knowledge asset| knowledge assets]] of an organization. The process of knowledge mapping involves defining the knowledge domain to be mapped and the relationships within the domain and creating a symbolic representation of this.
  
Knowledge mapping involves defining relationships between the selected knowledge domains. It may also include locating the knowledge in the organisation or defining the relevant knowledge processes that act on the knowledge in question. For example how knowledge is transferred or codified.  
+
== Variations ==
 +
Knowledge mapping can have similar variations according its purpose.  
  
Knowledge mapping may concentrate on the current situation or have a future oriented view. Thus it can also be used as a tool for determining possible [[Knowledge loss|knowledge loss]] risks or [[Knowledge gap|knowledge gaps]].
+
* It may concentrate on the current situation or have a future oriented view.  
 +
* It may concern itself with knowledge of one individual, knowledge of a team or knowledge of a whole organisation.  
  
The output of knowledge mapping is a [[Knowledge map|knowledge map]].
+
Knowledge mapping can be used as a tool in several situations.
 +
For example:
 +
* determining [[Knowledge loss|knowledge loss]] risks or knowledge gaps, or
 +
* when facilitating [[Knowledge process|knowledge processes]], or
 +
* used as a complementary mechanism in a work hand over process, e.g. for succession purposes.
  
Examples of different ways of [[Mapping|mapping]] [2]:
+
The output of knowledge mapping is a [[Knowledge map|knowledge map]]. The exact form of the output and the suitable mapping process depend on the objective of creating the [[Knowledge map|knowledge map]]. The end result can be
# Maps that are automatically and dynamically generated by the computer (such as self-organizing maps)
+
* A [[Concept map|concept map]],
# Maps that are semi-automatically generated (automatically assembled and then optimized by analysts)
+
* A concept tree,
# Maps that are designed once by domain and mapping experts and then used in the same way by all users
+
* A [[Process map|process map]],
# Maps that are iteratively created, modified, or extended by the map user(s) themselves (community generated maps)
+
* A knowledge web-page,
 +
* A [[Wiki|wiki]],
 +
* A reparatory grid,
 +
* or other suitable output.
  
===Case studies===
+
Reference [1] provides an example of a knowledge mapping process on an organizational level.
Reference [1] provides on example of a knowledge mapping process on an organizational level.
+
 
 +
== Success factors ==
 +
* The availability of a suitable modelling software package is essential.
 +
* Modelled knowledge should be validated by other experts and peers if possible.
 +
* Ensure that the knowledge maps are available (read-only) for others to view.  A portal or intranet is usually needed for this.
 +
* Experience in the use of knowledge mapping software is essential – although most packages are very easy to use.
 +
 
 +
== Common pitfalls ==
 +
* Trying to map a too broad knowledge domain.  This may lead to too complex knowledge maps which are difficult to understand.
 +
* Mapping readily known and understood information.
 +
* Providing only a superficial view of the selected knowledge domain. There are knowledge domains which can not be captured on a single page of a knowledge map!
 +
* Creating a knowledge map without sufficient review. In this case the map stays incomplete and difficult to understand.
 +
* Not sharing or transferring the knowledge. If a knowledge is mapped and never used then the whole process has little value.
  
 
== References ==
 
== References ==
 
[1] Day, J., How Knowledge Mapping is Being Used to Integrate Plans for Safe and Reliable Operations, In International Conference on Human Resource Development for Nuclear Power Programmes: Building and Sustaining Capacity Strategies for Education and Training, Networking and Knowledge Management, IAEA CN‐215, 2014, pp. 167-169.
 
[1] Day, J., How Knowledge Mapping is Being Used to Integrate Plans for Safe and Reliable Operations, In International Conference on Human Resource Development for Nuclear Power Programmes: Building and Sustaining Capacity Strategies for Education and Training, Networking and Knowledge Management, IAEA CN‐215, 2014, pp. 167-169.
 
[2] Eppler M., A Process-Based Classification of Knowledge Maps and Application Examples, Knowledge and Process Management, Volume 15 Number 1 pp 59–71 (2008), http://lpis.csd.auth.gr/mtpx/km/material/knowledge%20maps.pdf
 
  
 
==Related articles==
 
==Related articles==
[[Map (disambiguation)]]
 
  
 
[[Knowledge map]]
 
[[Knowledge map]]
  
[[Concept map]]
+
[[Concept mapping]]
 
+
[[Competency map]]
+
  
[[Competency mapping]]
+
[[Process mapping]]
  
[[category:Tools]]
+
[[Category:Knowledge mapping]]
[[category:Mapping]]
+
[[category:Competency]]
+
[[category:CSA]]
+

Latest revision as of 14:36, 21 March 2016


Definition

The process of creating a knowledge map

Purpose and benefit

Knowledge mapping is a process which creates a map of a selected knowledge domain, i.e. knowledge map. Knowledge mapping can be used as a tool to facilitate knowledge processes, e.g. learning, or business processes, e.g. evaluating the risk of knowledge loss. Knowledge mapping may be performed by just one person, relating to their personal knowledge or on the level of the whole organisation or anything in between, and it can concentrate on the current situation or have a future oriented view. It helps to see where knowledge resides and where possible gaps are.

Description

Knowledge mapping is a mapping process which can be used for managing knowledge or knowledge assets of an organization. The process of knowledge mapping involves defining the knowledge domain to be mapped and the relationships within the domain and creating a symbolic representation of this.

Variations

Knowledge mapping can have similar variations according its purpose.

  • It may concentrate on the current situation or have a future oriented view.
  • It may concern itself with knowledge of one individual, knowledge of a team or knowledge of a whole organisation.

Knowledge mapping can be used as a tool in several situations. For example:

  • determining knowledge loss risks or knowledge gaps, or
  • when facilitating knowledge processes, or
  • used as a complementary mechanism in a work hand over process, e.g. for succession purposes.

The output of knowledge mapping is a knowledge map. The exact form of the output and the suitable mapping process depend on the objective of creating the knowledge map. The end result can be

Reference [1] provides an example of a knowledge mapping process on an organizational level.

Success factors

  • The availability of a suitable modelling software package is essential.
  • Modelled knowledge should be validated by other experts and peers if possible.
  • Ensure that the knowledge maps are available (read-only) for others to view. A portal or intranet is usually needed for this.
  • Experience in the use of knowledge mapping software is essential – although most packages are very easy to use.

Common pitfalls

  • Trying to map a too broad knowledge domain. This may lead to too complex knowledge maps which are difficult to understand.
  • Mapping readily known and understood information.
  • Providing only a superficial view of the selected knowledge domain. There are knowledge domains which can not be captured on a single page of a knowledge map!
  • Creating a knowledge map without sufficient review. In this case the map stays incomplete and difficult to understand.
  • Not sharing or transferring the knowledge. If a knowledge is mapped and never used then the whole process has little value.

References

[1] Day, J., How Knowledge Mapping is Being Used to Integrate Plans for Safe and Reliable Operations, In International Conference on Human Resource Development for Nuclear Power Programmes: Building and Sustaining Capacity Strategies for Education and Training, Networking and Knowledge Management, IAEA CN‐215, 2014, pp. 167-169.

Related articles

Knowledge map

Concept mapping

Process mapping